“Congress will never mount a new 9/11 investigation—I’ve tried that. Our courts and our district attorneys won’t do it either; that, too, has been attempted unsuccessfully. Only the citizens themselves can get a real investigation. The best path remaining is that which Senator Gravel has spent part of his life working on: the citizens' initiative.”
- Cynthia McKinney, six-term U.S. Congressperson (D-Georgia),
2008 Presidential Candidate (Green Party)
"The best route to justice for the crimes of 9/11 must be, in our time, through the vehicle of state initiatives."
- Former U.S. Representative Dan Hamburg (D-Ukiah)
“We must go around the federal government and use state ballot initiatives to get a truly independent investigation of the crimes of 9/11 and their coverup.”
- Dr. Robert M. Bowman, Former Director, Advanced Space Programs Development, USAF
“I fully endorse the call for a significant investigation of 9/11 with subpoena power and free of federal government interference.”
- Dr. Steven E. Jones, Full Professor of Physics (retired), Brigham Young University
“It is time for a full public investigation of 9/11 with subpoena power. Why should any patriotic American be opposed to finding out the truth?”
- Dr. Kevin Danaher, Co-Founder, Global Exchange
“We urgently need a proper investigation, with the power to subpoena evidence and testimony.” - Peter Dale Scott, Professor Emeritus, University of California at Berkeley,
Distinguished Author and Poet
A poll taken about whether "reinvestigate 9/11" should be a demand of the Occupy Wall Street movement drew a record 72,000 votes, 83% of which were in favor!
http://coupmedia.org/the-sovereign-peoples-movement/6-re-investigate-the-attacks-of-9-11-2001.html
Is your city under "occupation?" 
Reach out to the "occupiers!" 
"Finally we 
have an actionable choice: If we don't want to continue living by what most of the world recognizes as our national lies about 9/11, we can show we mean business at the ballot-box by empowering a real investigation of 9/11 that will help bring its real perpetrators to justice and restore our national sense of decency."
Greetings fellow campaigners!
I am more excited than I can say by the wonderful opportunity to help the Citizens 9/11 Commission Campaign communicate its case to the people, many of whom are, like me, fed up after 10 years of government cover-up and intransigence. This official response from our elected officials persists despite the efforts by so many of us to compel them to conduct a real investigation into the horrendous events of September 11, 2001. And so we the people have no choice as citizens but to do it ourselves. In my introductory statement to the Steering Committee, I wrote the following:
It is my feeling that the 9-11cc has a real chance of success, but its ability to progress rapidly will likely depend on touching something deeper in the American people than the often arcane scientific disputes with the government's mendacious 9/11 narrative. While some of us may respond on the level of scientific argument, the majority of Americans, as polls repeatedly demonstrate, have doubts about what they are being told by our government concerning 9/11 (and hopefully about the jingoistic foreign policy which flows from it), yet are quickly bewildered by the complexity of the 9/11 truth movement's frequently contradictory (and increasingly contentious) explications. What is this deeper chord which needs to be struck in order to resonate with average Americans? I suggest that the answer may lie in focusing, not on 9/11 truth itself, nor even on a laudable effort to empower a citizens' initiative per se (although this is clearly the indispensable tactic to channel it), but rather, on that deepest common denominator of the body politic, the question of JUSTICE itself. 9/11 is, in its essence, an unsolved crime.
Nearly ten years after the crimes of 9/11, memories of the event are becoming dim, and key witnesses are at risk of disappearing. For the sake of obtaining justice in some future venue, there is no reason why a safe, open, and transparent judicial process cannot be created now, ahead of a legally constituted new investigation. Dozens of witness accounts, expert testimonies, and documents (textual, audio, or video)—much of it now simply posted on the internet—could be sworn in and filed as part of such a formal judicial process. Such an approach provides a reasonable answer to the following crucial question: Why leave this evidence in the realm of “hearsay” when much of it could be converted to evidence for the prosecution of a crime?
Answering this question is the intent of several groups active now in Canada whose work we applaud: The International Hearings and Inquest on the Events of September 11, 2001, also known as the Toronto Hearings. Founded by Canadian and American citizens, these activists have constituted an internationally recognized and respected process that will serve the juridical purposes explained above, with the goal of lending it a credibility and integrity that can withstand any test of legitimacy.They are working with some of the best legal minds in the United States and Canada.
The work of the Toronto Hearings is, in effect, an International Inquest. (In law, an inquest is an inquiry into the cause of an unexplained death, sometimes held by a coroner, and in certain cases with a jury present.) Thus, the objectives of the Project are as follows:
1. To compile and safeguard available evidence pertaining to the events of 9/11;
2. To have this evidence filed in a globally publicized and transparent judicial process especially created for this purpose;
3. To have this judicial process review all available evidence, including presentations by witnesses and independent experts, as well as review the key findings of the 9/11 Commission Report and the NIST WTC reports;
4. To have three internationally respected judges, one American, one Canadian and one from a third country, pass judgment on the case. Alternatively, to have a respected international citizen panel perform this task.
The initiators of the International Hearings Project have opted for a location outside of the United States for this work, because of the global ramifications of the events of 9/11. The city of Toronto, Canada has been chosen as this ideal “international” location because of its proximity to New York, Washington and Shanksville (the key crime scenes).
Sponsored by the International Center for 9/11 Studies, the first four days of these hearings will take place at Toronto’s Ryerson University between September 8 and 11, 2011. During these proceedings, which will be broadcasted live via the Internet, various expert witnesses will present evidence into the case.
Further hearings to present evidence in the case are intended for the Fall of 2011. The initiators of the Hearings are actively fundraising to pursue the work of the International Inquest following the initial September hearings, with the ultimate goal of finding the truth pertaining to the events of 9/11 and triggering the corresponding international and national legal recourses.